Buckingham potential: Difference between revisions
Carl McBride (talk | contribs) m (Added a publñication)  | 
				Carl McBride (talk | contribs)  m (→References:   Added a recent publication)  | 
				||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
;Related reading  | ;Related reading  | ||
*[http://www.znaturforsch.com/ra/s64a0200.pdf Teik-Cheng Lim "Alignment of Buckingham Parameters to Generalized Lennard-Jones Potential Functions", Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A  '''64a''' pp. 200-204 (2009)]  | *[http://www.znaturforsch.com/ra/s64a0200.pdf Teik-Cheng Lim "Alignment of Buckingham Parameters to Generalized Lennard-Jones Potential Functions", Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A  '''64a''' pp. 200-204 (2009)]  | ||
*[https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2017.1407003 Teik-Cheng Lim and James Alexander Dawson "A convenient and accurate wide-range parameter relationship between Buckingham and Morse potential energy functions", Molecular Physics '''116''' pp. 1127-1132 (2018)]  | |||
[[category: models]]  | [[category: models]]  | ||
Latest revision as of 11:48, 20 April 2018
The Buckingham potential is given by [1]
where is the intermolecular pair potential, , and , and are constants.
The Buckingham potential describes the exchange repulsion, which originates from the Pauli exclusion principle, by a more realistic exponential function of distance, in contrast to the inverse twelfth power used by the Lennard-Jones potential. However, since the Buckingham potential remains finite even at very small distances, it runs the risk of an un-physical "Buckingham catastrophe" at short range when used in simulations of charged systems. This occurs when the electrostatic attraction artificially overcomes the repulsive barrier. The Lennard-Jones potential is also about 4 times quicker to compute [2] and so is more frequently used in computer simulations.
See also[edit]
References[edit]
- ↑ R. A. Buckingham "The Classical Equation of State of Gaseous Helium, Neon and Argon", Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 168 pp. 264-283 (1938)
 - ↑ David N. J. White "A computationally efficient alternative to the Buckingham potential for molecular mechanics calculations", Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 11 pp.517-521 (1997)
 
- Related reading
 
- Teik-Cheng Lim "Alignment of Buckingham Parameters to Generalized Lennard-Jones Potential Functions", Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A 64a pp. 200-204 (2009)
 - Teik-Cheng Lim and James Alexander Dawson "A convenient and accurate wide-range parameter relationship between Buckingham and Morse potential energy functions", Molecular Physics 116 pp. 1127-1132 (2018)